Translation Error
'나까지 알게 된 그 말이 그 물'이란 말을 어떻게 해석을 할까? 정치 활동과 생리에 문외한이라고 해석을 할까? 아니면 교만하다고 말을 할까? 그 말 자체로 판단을 하기 보다는 상황에 대한 무엇인가 다른 정보가 필요한 것이 아닐까 싶다. 시스템에 의한 일의 처리란 것이, 특히 기업 활동 분야에서는, 때때로 중요하다. 선 경험과 전문 지식이 정말 한치 앞을 알 수 없는 사람 사는 사회에서, 특히 이윤 추구 영리 추구 이해 관계 추구의 행위에 있어서, 정말 중요하다.
선 경험과 전문 지식이 정말 한치 앞을 알 수 없는 사람 사는 사회에서, 특히 순간을 다투는 이윤 추구 영리 추구 이해 관계 추구의 행위에 있어서, 더구나 협상이나 딜의 역할이 그 중요성을 더해가는 시기에 있어서, 정말 중요하다. 또한 자본의, 돈의, 위력이 사람 사는 사회에서 하루가 모르게 점입가경의 경지에 이르고 있는 그래서 사람 위에 군림을 하고 있는 경지에 다다른 모습을 보면 더더욱 그렇다.
그런데 궁극적으로 서로 다른 시대와 상황에 처한 현실을 이해하고 파악하고 시스템을 적용을 하고 운용을 하는 것은 누구일까? 사람이다. 사람의 개개인의 능력에 따라 동일한 시스템이라도 그 효과가, 특히 비용 면을 고려를 하고 미래에 미칠 영향을 고려를 하고 그 결과가 사람 사는 사회에 끼칠 영향을 고려를 하면, 더더욱 그럴 것이다.
NSA나 CIA나 가지는 정보나 그 위력이 사람 사는 사회를 윤택하게 하는데 사용이 될 수도 있고 몇몇 불감증에 걸린 사람들이 자신의 재미와 아집과 고집과 편견과 선입견에 걸신에 들린 것처럼 사람과 사람 사이에 이간질과 농간질 하여 서로 간에 분쟁을 불러 일으켜서 사람 사는 사회가 파국으로 치닫는 것에 사용이 될 수도 있다.
Believable Or Unbelievable about my talks and my gestures and my phenomena which tells about the existence of Spirits, ie. I AMs, ie. God and His Angels, ie. Jehovah Yahweh The Lord God and so on, when I was a little child under age 11 Year 1965 through Year 1976 at my hometown, several persons who talked about religions in this world came to me in order to find out what is the identity of something, (in)visible (in)audible (in)tangible (un)touchable and so on, which talk to me and communicate with me without verbal or oral words in the Sky or in the Space or in the Cosmos.
Only from the viewpoint of a little child who do not know human words and human customs and human religions and human society and also, as a result of it, who does not know how to express what he sees and hears and smells and feels and experiences and cognizes in every day's life in human words, what kind of responses and answers will be expected from the child? Especially, if the child has some real experiences with the existences of Spirits, ie. God and His Angels, and everything in this world is unfamiliar strange curious to him, what kind of results will be expected from the child about the persons who talk about religions in this world in human words?
Usually the person who talks about traditional customs and traditional courtesy and traditional way of life which lose its original purpose and as a result of it the dignity of human itself and human society itself seem to try to make the child to follow what the person tries to say and to be accustomed to it without any other opinion regardless of whether the child understands it or not.
Also the person who tries to talk about The Bible and God and His Angels and
And the person who talks about Buddhism seems to try to talk in order to find out whether or not the child understands what he tries to say and
Regardless of the results of their diagnosis about me and my status, what kind of words and conversations with them will be expected from the child? Each human has each one's own soul/mind/spirit in each one's body, ie. each one's own soul/mind/spirit is different from each one's physical body.
Like the similar case, even though the child can communicate with and play with Spirits, as God and His Angels, who are invisible or inaudible or intangible or etc to other humans and in different world from this world, the child is quite different from Spirits, as God and His Angels, in different world from this world.
The situation can be guessed from the communications between human being's soul and human being's body or between invisible human being and visible human being or between human’s world and the world of Spirits as God and His Angels.
The only difference between the child’s situation and the exampled situation is that the essence between Spirits as God and His Angels and Human Being with Soul/Mind/Spirit is originally different from each other, as far as I can know.
Anyway who is good person from the viewpoint of a little child, even though they are all human beings who usually talk about something which the child does not know and also what they try to say is the activities of human beings from the viewpoints of Spirits as God and His Angels?
If the child said that the person who talked about Buddhism, ie. actually what he and others knew and realized from their own reasoning and thoughts, was good for the child to have conversations, how would it be understood from the viewpoint of our society in the country site around Year 1970?
And what was the conclusion? Postponement of decision up to my age 40 when I can say something with my own words?
Today we can hear about several persons who talk about the world of Spirits as God and His Angels and especially about lots of types of experiences with the world of Spirits as God and His Angels. And there are also lots of persons who talk about lots of religions, also sometimes as a kind of scientific or academic study, and also next world after this world.
But, if there are human-to-human words, made by some human groups due to personal social interest purposes, which will hinder or prevent political or economical or religious activities of someone who talks about his own experiences about the world of Spirits as God and His Angels during his whole life just like human being's realization from asceticism or penance or mortification, or just like the world of human being's soul/mind/spirit, how will be understood in Year 2000?
ONE DAY DURING YEAR 1989 ~ YEAR 1991 WHEN I RETURNED TO MY STURY AFTER I FINISHED MY ABOUT 30 MONTHS’ ARMY SERVICE DUTY, A JUNIOR CAME TO ME WHEN I READ SOME BOOKS IN THE DEPARTMENT OFFICE OF MY UNIVERSITY IN GWANAK MOUNTAIN IN ORDERR TO KNOW WHAT KINDS OF ACTIVITIES WOULD BE BETTER FOR CERTAIN SITUATIONS AND TALKED ABOUT THE SITUATIONS RELATED TO SOMEONE WHO TALKED ABOUT THE WOLRD OF SPIRITS AS GOD AND HIS ANGELS AND THE IDENTITY OR THE ACTUAL EXISTENCE OF SPIRITS AS GOD AND HIS ANGELS. SO, WHAT I SAID WAS AS FOLLOWS; IT DEPENDS ON WHAT KIND OF SITUATIONS THE SITUATIONS ARE, BUT IF THE SITUATIONS ARE RELATED TO THE SITUATIONS TO TALK ABOUT THE WOLRD OF SPIRITS AS GOD AND HIS ANGELS AND THE ACTUAL EXISTENCE OF SPIRITS AS GOD AND HIS ANGELS, JUST TRY TO LISTEN TO WHAT THE PERSON TRIES TO SAY AND ALSO TRIES TO MAKE SURROUNDING CIRCUMSTANCES ACCORDING TO WHAT THE PERSON SAYS, BECAUSE ALL HUMAN BEINGS DIRECTLY CANNOT SEE OR COGNIZE THE EXISTENCES OF SPIRITS AS GOD AND HIS ANGELS, AS WE KNOW IT, AS WE CANNOT SEE OR TOUCH EVEN OUR SOULS IN OUR BODIES.
AS AN EXAMPLE, IF YOU TRY TO OPEN YOUR CLOTHES AND ALSO TRY TO OPEN YOUR BODY BY SURGICAL OPERATION IN ORDER TO SHOW SOMEONE SOMETHIN IN THE INDISDE OF YOUR BODY OR YOUR SOUL/MIND/SPIRIT IN YOUR BODY, WHAT KIND OF THINGS CAN BE SEEN FROM YOU OR THE INSIDE OF YOUR BODY? OR HOW CAN YOUR SOUL/MIND/SPIRIT IN YOUR BODY BE SEEN? OF COURSE, IT ALSO DEPENDS ON WHAT KIND OF HUMAN BEING HE/SHE IS OR WHAT KIND OF ABILITY AND TALENT HE/SHE HAS. THERE ARE A
AND AT THAT TIME WHEN I SAY THE EXPRESSIONS, ‘IF YOU TRY TO OPEN YOUR CLOTHES AND ALSO TRY TO OPEN YOUR BODY BY SURGICAL OPERATION IN ORDER TO SHOW SOMEONE SOMETHIN IN YOU BODY OR YOUR SOUL/MIND/SPIRIT IN YOUR BODY’, IF THE ACTUAL PHYSICAL BODY UNDER CLOTHES OF SOMEONE COULD BE SHOWN, AND IF THE BLOODY INSIDE OF THE BODY OF SOMEONE COULD BE SEEN, HOW COULD IT BE TRANSLATED ACCORDING TO THE RELIGION OF THE JUNIOR OR ACCORDING TO THE JUNIOR’S CONCEPT OF RELIGION OR ACCORDIN TO WHAT THE JUNIOR AND OTHERS THOUGHT AT THAT TIME OR ACCORDING TO WHAT I SAID?
WHAT KIND OF WORDS DID I SAY TO THE JUNIOR ABOUT THE RESULT OF SEEING THE ACTUAL PHYSICAL BODY UNDER CLOTHES OF THE JUNIOR? WHAT KIND OF RESPONSES DID THE JUNIOR GIVE TO ME? WHAT KIND OF RESPONSES DID I SAY AGAIN ABOUT THE JUNIOR’S RESPONSES?
WHAT DID IT MEAN THAT WHAT I SAY ABOUT RELIGION AND THE IDENTITY OF SPIRITS AS GOD AND HIS
To be continued...The Film, Scenario, Of, Ten, Production, 20070604, JUNGHEEDEUK, 정희득.
'성령, 잉태, Spirit, Conception' 카테고리의 다른 글
| ‘교’씨 가문의 ‘황청’이에 대한 이야기 (0) | 2007.08.15 |
|---|---|
| 사람의 수명 (0) | 2007.08.15 |
| 바람의 아들, 영의 아들, 신의 아들, 천사, (0) | 2007.06.12 |
| 아름다운 날들의 연속 02 (0) | 2007.06.12 |
| Cows And Bees and Other Animals (0) | 2007.05.30 |
